Autoimmune anti-D in an RhD-positive young infant: Learning from a rare case.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Anti-D is usually immune in nature and is formed in individuals lacking D antigen or having variants/altered D phenotypes. In the Indian population, 93.8% are RhD positive, and R1 R1 is the commonest Rh phenotype. Here we report a rare and interesting case of autoimmune anti-D in an RhD-positive 3-month-old infant leading to warm autoimmune haemolytic anaemia. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Auto-anti-D was detected serologically by immunohaematological techniques such as direct antiglobulin test, antibody detection and identification, dithiothreitol, enzyme treatment, antibody titration and elution. Molecular studies were performed to rule out genetic variants of RhD. RESULTS: Anti-D was confirmed in eluate and blood group post elution was B RhD positive. On genotyping using the Indian-specific RHD genotyping assay, the sample was found to be negative for the RHD*01W.150 (most common RhD variant in Indians) but positive for RHD exon 5 and RHD exon 10 along with glyceraldehyde-3-phosphate dehydrogenase (GAPDH). The sample was further sequenced for RHD exons 1-10 by Sanger sequencing and found to be a wild type, thus, ruling out the presence of an RhD variant. CONCLUSION: This case is of interest because of the rare occurrence of autoimmune anti-D in an RhD-positive patient of such a young age (3 months). To the best of our knowledge, only two case reports have been published on autoimmune anti-D in infancy (in 1961 and 1964).

Asian-type DEL (RHD*DEL1) with an allo-anti-D: A paradoxical observation in a healthy multiparous woman.

BACKGROUND: The DEL phenotype is the D variant expressing the least amounts of D antigen per red cell. Asian-type DEL (RHD:c:1227G > A) is the most prevalent DEL in East Asia without any anti-D alloimmunization reported before. We investigated the first observation of an anti-D in any DEL phenotype, reported in the Japanese language at a 1987 conference, only 3 years after the discovery of DEL. METHODS: We contacted the proband 35 years after the initial report. Standard hemagglutination, adsorption/elution, and flow cytometry tests were performed, as was nucleotide sequencing for the RHD, RHCE, and HLA class I and class II genes. RESULTS: The healthy multiparous Japanese woman, a regular blood donor, still had the anti-D of titer 8 representing an alloantibody by standard serologic methods. Unexpectedly, she carried an Asian-type DEL without any additional RHD gene variation. All 12 HLA alleles identified were known in the Japanese population. Interestingly, one of her HLA-DRB1 and a variant of her HLA-DQB1 alleles had previously been associated with anti-D immunization. CONCLUSION: We described an allo-anti-D, maintained for more than three decades, in an Asian-type DEL. The combination of two implicated HLA alleles were rare and could have contributed to the anti-D immunization. Continued monitoring of anti-D immunization events in patients with DEL is warranted, and we discuss possible mechanisms for further study. As only this single observation has been recognized in the last 35 years, the current recommendation is affirmed: Individuals with Asian-type DEL should be treated as Rh D-positive for transfusion and Rh immune prophylaxis purposes.

Terminating Routine Cord Blood RhD Typing of the Newborns to Guide Postnatal Anti-D Immunoglobulin Prophylaxis Based on the Results of Fetal RHD Genotyping.

INTRODUCTION: Targeted routine antenatal prophylaxis with anti-D immunoglobulin (Ig) only to RhD-negative pregnant women who carry RhD-positive fetuses (determined by fetal RHD genotyping) has reduced D-alloimmunization significantly when administered in addition to postnatal prophylaxis. Achieving high analysis sensitivity and few false-negative fetal RHD results will make RhD typing of the newborn redundant. Postnatal prophylaxis can then be given based on the result of fetal RHD genotyping. Terminating routine RhD typing of the newborns in cord blood will streamline maternity care. Accordingly, we compared the results of fetal RHD genotyping with RhD typing of the newborns. METHODS: Fetal RHD genotyping was performed, and antenatal anti-D Ig was administered at gestational week 24 and 28, respectively. Data for 2017-2020 are reported. RESULTS: Ten laboratories reported 18,536 fetal RHD genotypings, and 16,378 RhD typing results of newborns. We found 46 false-positive (0.28%) and seven false-negative (0.04%) results. Sensitivity of the assays was 99.93%, while specificity was 99.24%. CONCLUSION: Few false-negative results support the good analysis quality of fetal RHD genotyping. Routine cord blood RhD typing will therefore be discontinued nationwide and postnatal anti-D Ig will now be given based on the result of fetal RHD genotyping.

Obstetric and Newborn Weak D-Phenotype RBC Testing and Rh Immune Globulin Management Recommendations: Lessons From a Blinded Specimen-Testing Survey of 81 Transfusion Services.

CONTEXT.­: Modern RHD genotyping can be used to determine when patients with serologic weak D phenotypes have RHD gene variants at risk for anti-D alloimmunization. However, serologic testing, RhD interpretations, and laboratory management of these patients are quite variable. OBJECTIVE.­: To obtain interlaboratory comparisons of serologic testing, RhD interpretations, Rh immune globulin (RhIG) management, fetomaternal hemorrhage testing, and RHD genotyping for weak D-reactive specimens. DESIGN.­: We devised an educational exercise in which 81 transfusion services supporting obstetrics performed tube-method RhD typing on 2 unknown red blood cell challenge specimens identified as (1) maternal and (2) newborn. Both specimens were from the same weak D-reactive donor. The exercise revealed how participants responded to these different clinical situations. RESULTS.­: Of reporting laboratories, 14% (11 of 80) obtained discrepant immediate-spin reactions on the 2 specimens. Nine different reporting terms were used to interpret weak D-reactive maternal RhD types to obstetricians. In laboratories obtaining negative maternal immediate-spin reactions, 28% (16 of 57) performed unwarranted antiglobulin testing, sometimes leading to recommendations against giving RhIG. To screen for excess fetomaternal hemorrhage after a weak D-reactive newborn, 47% (34 of 73) of reporting laboratories would have employed a contraindicated fetal rosette test, risking false-negative results and inadequate RhIG coverage. Sixty percent (44 of 73) of laboratories would obtain RHD genotyping in some or all cases. CONCLUSIONS.­: For obstetric and neonatal patients with serologic weak D phenotypes, we found several critical problems in transfusion service laboratory practices. We provide recommendations for appropriate testing, consistent immunohematologic terminology, and RHD genotype-guided management of Rh immune globulin therapy and RBC transfusions.

Investigating anti-D in an individual with the weak D type 2 genotype.

Anti-D in individuals with a weak D phenotype is an unexpected finding that may require additional investigation to determine whether the anti-D is an autoantibody or alloantibody. Further investigation may also include assessment of the patient's RHD genotype and exclusion of anti-G. We present a case of an 84-year-old man with the weak D type 2 genotype who developed an unexpected anti-D along with anti-C. Individuals with the weak D type 2 genotype are thought not to be at risk for developing alloanti-D, although the distinction between alloanti-D and autoanti-D may be difficult to ascertain. Furthermore, investigations may affect transfusion recommendations. This patient was restricted to crossmatch-compatible, D-C- red blood cells even though the clinical significance of the anti-D was uncertain. This report is one of a few reported cases of an individual with the weak D type 2 genotype with demonstrable anti-D but without evidence for alloanti-D.

Transfusion support during childbirth for a woman with anti-U and the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele.

D- red blood cells (RBCs), always in short supply, and Rh immune globulin (RhIG) are not needed for patient care if D+ RBCs can safely be transfused. According to a recent work group recommendation, patients with the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele can be considered D+. We report an African American woman who presented for delivery at the end of the third trimester, at which time anti-U and a serologic weak D phenotype were recognized, requiring U-, D- RBC units. We obtained 3 U- RBC units, including 1 D- unit. Later, the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele was determined by RHD genotyping, only 6 days before delivery. The patient had an uneventful vaginal delivery of a D+ baby. No transfusion was needed for mother or baby. In this case, a pregnant woman with the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele can safely be managed as D+, relaxing the unnecessary D- restriction for the limited U- RBC supply. The procured U-, D- RBC unit was frozen with 14 days of shelf-life remaining. To conserve D- RBC units, not limited to U-, for patients with a definite need, we recommend molecular analysis of a serologic weak D phenotype before a transfusion becomes imminent. The best time to resolve a serologic weak D phenotype with RHD genotyping is early in a pregnancy. Immunohematology 2021;37:1-4 .D­ red blood cells (RBCs), always in short supply, and Rh immune globulin (RhIG) are not needed for patient care if D+ RBCs can safely be transfused. According to a recent work group recommendation, patients with the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele can be considered D+. We report an African American woman who presented for delivery at the end of the third trimester, at which time anti-U and a serologic weak D phenotype were recognized, requiring U­, D­ RBC units. We obtained 3 U­ RBC units, including 1 D­ unit. Later, the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele was determined by RHD genotyping, only 6 days before delivery. The patient had an uneventful vaginal delivery of a D+ baby. No transfusion was needed for mother or baby. In this case, a pregnant woman with the RHD*weak D type 4.0 allele can safely be managed as D+, relaxing the unnecessary D­ restriction for the limited U­ RBC supply. The procured U­, D­ RBC unit was frozen with 14 days of shelf-life remaining. To conserve D­ RBC units, not limited to U­, for patients with a definite need, we recommend molecular analysis of a serologic weak D phenotype before a transfusion becomes imminent. The best time to resolve a serologic weak D phenotype with RHD genotyping is early in a pregnancy. Immunohematology 2021;37:1­4 .

Insights into anti-D formation in carriers of RhD variants through studies of 3D intraprotein interactions.

BACKGROUND: Many RhD variants associated with anti-D formation (partial D) in carriers exposed to the conventional D antigen carry mutations affecting extracellular loop residues. Surprisingly, some carry mutations affecting transmembrane or intracellular domains, positions not thought likely to have a major impact on D epitopes. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: A wild-type Rh trimer (RhD1 RhAG2 ) was modeled by comparative modeling with the human RhCG structure. Taking trimer conformation, residue accessibility, and position relative to the lipid bilayer into account, we redefine the domains of the RhD protein. We generated models for RhD variants carrying one or two amino acid substitutions associated with anti-D formation in published articles (25 variants) or abstracts (12 variants) and for RHD*weak D type 38. We determined the extracellular substitutions and compared the interactions of the variants with those of the standard RhD. RESULTS: The findings of the three-dimensional (3D) analysis were correlated with anti-D formation for 76% of RhD variants: 15 substitutions associated with anti-D formation concerned extracellular residues, and structural differences in intraprotein interactions relative to standard RhD were observed in the others. We discuss the mechanisms by which D epitopes may be modified in variants in which the extracellular residues are identical to those of standard RhD and provide arguments for the benignity of p.T379M (RHD*DAU0) and p.G278D (RHD*weak D type 38) in transfusion medicine. CONCLUSION: The study of RhD intraprotein interactions and the precise redefinition of residue accessibility provide insight into the mechanisms through which RhD point mutations may lead to anti-D formation in carriers.

Impact of RHD genotyping on transfusion practice in Denmark and the United States and identification of novel RHD alleles.

BACKGROUND: Reduced D antigen on red blood cells (RBCs) may be due to "partial" D phenotypes associated with loss of epitope(s) and risk for alloimmunization or "weak" D phenotypes that do not lack major epitopes with absence of clinical complications. Genotyping of samples with weak and discrepant D typing is recommended to guide transfusion and RhIG prophylaxis. The goal was to compare the impact of RHD genotyping on transfusion practice in two centers serving different populations. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Fifty-seven samples from Denmark and 353 from the United States with weak or discrepant D typing were genotyped. RBC typing was by multiple methods and reagents. DNA isolated from white blood cells was tested with RBC-Ready Gene D weak or CDE in Denmark or RHD BeadChip in the United States. RHD was sequenced for those unresolved. RESULTS: Of Caucasian samples from Denmark, 90% (n = 51) had weak D types 1, 2, or 3; two had other weak D, two partial D, and two new alleles. In diverse ethnic U.S. samples, 44% (n = 155) had weak D types 1, 2, or 3 and 56% (n = 198) had other alleles: uncommon weak D (n = 13), weak 4.0 (n = 62), partial D (n = 107), no RHD (n = 9), and new alleles (n = 7). CONCLUSION: Most samples with weak or variable D typing from Denmark had alleles without risk for anti-D. In U.S. samples, 48% could safely be treated as D+, 18% may require consideration if pregnancy possible, and 34% could potentially benefit from being treated as D-. Black and multiracial ethnicities were overrepresented relative to population.

A multi-centre study on the performance of the molecular genotyping platform ID RHD XT for resolving serological weak RhD phenotype in routine clinical practice.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: There is concern regarding the lack of prevention of unnecessary transfusion of RhD negative red cells and unnecessary administration of Rh immunoglobulin (RhIG) to pregnant women. In this study, performance of ID RHD XT, a genotyping assay for identification of six RHD allelic variants and human platelet antigens HPA-1a/1b was assessed. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Whole blood samples presenting weak, discrepant or inconclusive D phenotype results were genotyped with ID RHD XT and compared to reference molecular tests. Candidacy for RhIG prophylaxis was determined by analysing samples from pregnant women. Hands-on time to complete the procedures was measured. RESULTS: Overall, 167 samples were tested (55 donors, 56 patients, 52 pregnant women and four newborns). Agreement between ID RHD XT and the reference method was 100% (51% weak D type 1, 2 or 3; 35·5% weak D Types 1, 2 or 3 not detected; 4% RHD deletion; 1% RHD*Pseudogene; 1% RHD*DIIIa-CE(3-7)-D; and 4% no amplification variant detected for RHD genotype; and 64% HPA-1a/a; 30% HPA-1a/b; and 3% HPA-1b/b for HPA-1 genotype). Call rate was 98·2%. ID RHD XT identified 40% of the pregnant women that would not have required RhIG prophylaxis. Overall hands-on time was 25-45 min to process a batch of 24 samples, and four hours for total assay time. CONCLUSION: ID RHD XT yielded reproducible results for RHD typing in serologically weak D phenotype individuals. ID RHD XT was proven useful for the correct management of patients with RhD serological discrepancies and the rational use of RhIG in pregnancy.

Identifying obstetrics patients in whom RHD genotyping can be used to assess risk of D alloimmunization.

CONCLUSIONS: The D antigen is highly immunogenic and may cause alloimmunization to occur after blood transfusion or pregnancy. Some RHD variant alleles express a D antigen that is missing one or more epitopes, thus putting a presumed D+ patient at risk for alloanti-D and hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn. It is generally accepted that individuals who have a serologic weak D phenotype due to one of three alleles common in Caucasians, RHD*weak D types 1, 2, or 3, are not at risk for alloimmunization. In this study, blood samples from 46 obstetrics patients from a local health system were identified based on discrepant results between automated gel and manual tube testing (n = 20) or based on presentation with a serologic weak D phenotype (n = 26). RHD genotyping was performed using commercial and laboratory-developed tests. Of the 26 serologic weak D samples, 18 (69.2%) were found to carry alleles RHD*weak D type 1, 2, or 3. The remaining eight samples (30.8%) were found to carry partial D alleles. Of the 20 samples submitted because of D typing discrepancy, 7 (35%) carried alleles RHD*weak D type 1, 2, or 3, while 13 (65%) carried partial RHD alleles. This report summarizes the findings of one hospital system and its approach to integrating RHD genotyping into its assessment of risk of alloimmunization in obstetrics patients. It demonstrates that individuals with partial RHD alleles can present with serologic weak D phenotype, such that, without RHD genotyping, these individuals may not be identified as candidates for Rh immune globulin. The study also demonstrates that use of two methods (automated gel and tube testing) allows for identification of partial D cases that would otherwise be missed. I.

Noninvasive fetal RHD genotyping to guide targeted anti-D prophylaxis-an external quality assessment workshop.

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Fetal RHD genotyping of cell-free fetal DNA from RhD-negative pregnant women can be used to guide targeted antenatal and postnatal anti-D prophylaxis for the prevention of RhD immunization. To assure the quality of clinical testing, we conducted an external quality assessment workshop with the participation of 28 laboratories. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Aliquots of pooled maternal plasma were sent to each laboratory. One sample was positive, and the second sample was negative for fetal RHD, verified by pre-workshop testing using quantitative real-time PCR (qPCR) analysis of RHD exons 4, 5, 7 and 10. Plasma samples were shipped at room temperature. A reporting scheme was supplied for data collection, including questions regarding the methodological setup, results and clinical recommendations. Different methodological approaches were used, all employing qPCR with a total of eight different combinations of RHD exon targets. The samples were tested blindly. RESULTS: Fetal RHD genotyping was performed with no false-negative and no false-positive results. One inconclusive result was reported for the RHD-positive sample, and four inconclusive results were reported for the RHD-negative sample. All clinical conclusions were satisfactory. CONCLUSION: This external quality assessment workshop demonstrates that despite the different approaches taken to perform the clinical assays, fetal RHD genotyping is a reliable laboratory assay to guide targeted use of Rh prophylaxis in a clinical setting.

Noninvasive Antenatal Screening for Fetal RHD in RhD Negative Women to Guide Targeted Anti-D Prophylaxis.

RhD negative pregnant women who carry an RhD positive fetus are at risk of immunization against the D antigen, which may result in hemolytic disease of the fetus and the newborn. Predicting the fetal RhD status by noninvasive antenatal screening for the fetal RhD gene (RHD) can guide targeted use of antenatal anti-D prophylaxis.Cell-free fetal DNA is extracted from maternal plasma from RhD negative pregnant women at a gestational age of 25 weeks. A real-time PCR-based detection of two RHD exons enables reliable prediction of the fetal RhD status to determine the administration of antenatal prophylaxis, as well as postnatal prophylaxis.

Alloimmunization risk associated with amino acid 223 substitution in the RhD protein: analysis in the light of molecular modeling.

BACKGROUND: Partial D status is a major concern for transfusion and pregnancy, due to the possibility of carriers becoming immunized. When known carriers of a D variant have never been exposed to complete D, they are assumed to have D partial status based on the position of the amino acid substituted. New approaches for predicting immunization risk are required. We built a three-dimensional (3D) structural model to investigate the consequences of substitutions of Amino Acid 223 involved in a large number of D variants. STUDY DESIGN AND METHODS: Homology modeling was performed with multiple templates. The model was evaluated by comparing the interactions of the known p.Phe223Val variant (RHD*08.01) and a new p.Phe223Ser variant (RHD*52) to RhD reference allele (p.Phe223). The consequences predicted by modeling the variants were compared with serologic data. RESULTS: The 3D structural model was generated from two related protein structures and assessed with state-of-the-art approaches. An analysis of the interactions of the variant Residue 223 in the proposed 3D model highlighted the importance of this position. Modeling predictions were consistent with the serologic and clinical data obtained for the D antigen with a substitution of Amino Acid 223. CONCLUSION: We used a 3D structural model to evaluate the effect of the p.Phe223 substitution on the conformation of the RhD protein. This model shed light on the influence of substitutions on the structure of the RhD protein and the associated alloimmunization risk. These initial findings indicate that the p.Phe223Ser variant can be considered partial.

High frequency of variant RHD genotypes among donors and patients of mixed origin with serologic weak-D phenotype.

BACKGROUND: The current transfusion policy recommended for individuals with serologic weak-D phenotype is based on data derived from European-descent populations. Data referring to the distribution of RH alleles underlying weak-D phenotype among people of mixed origin are yet incomplete, and the applicability of European-based transfusion guidelines to this specific population is questionable. GOAL: To evaluate the distribution of RHD variant genotype among individuals with serologic weak-D phenotype of both African and European descent. METHODS: Donors and patients of mixed origin and with serologic weak-D phenotype were selected for the study. They were investigated using conventional RHD-PCR assays and RHD whole-coding region direct sequencing. RESULTS: One hundred and six donors and 58 patients were included. There were 47 donors and 29 patients with partial-D genotype (47/106, 44.3%, and 29/58, 50%, respectively). RHD*DAR and RHD*weak D type 38 represented the most common altered RHD alleles among donors (joint frequency of 39.6%), while weak D types 1-3 accounted for 10.4% of the total D variant samples. RHD*DAR was the most common allele identified in the patient group (frequency of 31%), and weak D types 1-3 represented 29.3% of the total. CONCLUSION: The frequency of partial D among mixed individuals with serologic weak-D phenotype is high. They should be managed as D-negative patients until molecular tests are complete.

Lessons learned from the implementation of non-invasive fetal RHD screening.

INTRODUCTION: In the fight against hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn, pregnant RhD negative women are offered antenatal and postnatal anti-D immunoglobulin prophylaxis to prevent the development of antibodies against the fetal D antigen. Antenatal prophylaxis has traditionally been provided to all D negative pregnant women, as the fetal RhD type remains unknown until birth. With noninvasive prenatal testing of cell-free DNA, predicting the fetal RhD type has become highly feasible based on analysis of the fetal RHD gene. Fetal RHD screening can guide targeted antenatal prophylaxis, treating only women who carry an RhD positive fetus, thereby avoiding the unnecessary treatment of approximately 40% of the RhD negative women. Areas covered: Areas covered are the current clinical practice, performance, and challenges of fetal RHD screening, and relevant issues for its implementation. Expert commentary: Fetal RHD screening is highly accurate, with sensitivities of 99.9%, as reported from clinical programs. From gestational week 10, sensitivities are approximately 99%. Despite challenges in assay design, low levels of cell-free fetal DNA in the maternal plasma, and concerns regarding implementation and medical necessity, the clinical experience with fetal RHD screening and targeted prophylaxis has generated encouraging results, and its future widespread use is expected.

[Immunoserology and RHD Genotype Analysis of DVI Type 3 Genotype Pregnant Women with Anti-D].

OBJECTIVE: To performe the immuneserological and RHD Genotype analyses for DVI type 3 genotype pregnemt women with anti-D. METHODS: RhD blood type of this pregnant women was identified by common serological methods, then the blood group specific antibodies was screened and identified; the polymerase chain reaction-sequence specific primer(PCR-SSP) was used to identify the pregnant women's RHD genotype; RhD blood group for the pregnant women, her spouse and daughter was genogrouped and genetically analyzed by multiplex ligation-dependent probe amplification(MLPA). The heredity of this family was analyzed finally. RESULTS: The titer of IgG anti-D in the pregnant woman serum was 1:8; the PCR-SSP showed that the 3rd to 6th exons of RHD gene were missing in the pregnant woman. the genotype of pregnant woman was identified as DVI type 3; the MLPA analysis showed that this pregnant women owned only one RHD allele with 3rd to 6th exons missed, and her genotype was identified as CDVIe/cde; her spouse was identified as CDe/CDe homozygous genotype, and her daughter as CDe/CDVIe. CONCLUSION: Accurate identification of RhD blood type is of great significance for a safe and effective clinical blood transfusion strategy, and for taking appropriate measures to prevent hemolytic disease of newborn (HDN) at women childbearing age.

Two cases of the variant RHD*DAU5 allele associated with maternal alloanti-D.

CONCLUSIONS: Rh is a complex blood group system with diverse genotypes that may encode weak and partial D variants. Standard serologic analysis may identify clinically significant D variants as D+; nevertheless, individuals with these D variants should be managed as D- patients to prevent antibody formation to absent D epitopes. Variant identification is necessary during pregnancy to allow for timely and appropriate Rh immune globulin (RhIG) prophylaxis for hemolytic disease of the fetus and newborn (HDFN) as D alloimmunization can occur with some D variants. Here, we describe two cases of the RHD*DAU5 allele associated with maternal alloanti-D in patients of African ancestry. Two obstetric patients were initially serologically classified as D+ with negative antibody detection tests on routine prenatal testing. Repeat testing at delivery identified anti-D in both patients with no history of RhIG administration or transfusion. DNA sequencing revealed that both patients possessed the RHD*DAU5 allele. Cord blood testing on both infants revealed positive direct antiglobulin test (DAT) results with anti-D eluted from the red blood cells (RBCs) of one of the infants. Despite the positive DAT, neither infant experienced anemia or hyperbilirubinemia. We document two cases of pregnant women whose RBCs expressed a partial D variant and were classified as D+ on the basis of standard serologic testing, resulting in subsequent failure to provide RhIG prophylaxis. Both cases were associated with alloanti-D formation but without significant HDFN. To our knowledge, these are the first reported cases of maternal alloanti-D associated with the RHD*DAU5 partial D variant.